Daniel Ritzenthaler

Design and Research “AI” is Paving the Wrong Roads

I’m not convinced the “AI” is doing much of the work. The permission to go full-feature-factory is where the gains are coming from. When the tools enable “I have a cool idea” to become “my idea is validated by research” without understanding the situational context of the user, things will dramatically speed up. The team will appear more productive.

- -

Designing with “AI”

I want to see how they work. I want to personally explore and critique their potential value. I want to have a “library” of experiments to pull from as I encounter new obstacles. Experiments I can combine or extend from memory without needing time to figure out how to do them in the moment.

Situationally Reflective Design

Over the last few months of attempting to observe my behavior while designing things, this is what I see myself doing. It’s holding many incomplete threads as potentially useful in the future. It’s weaving them together. It’s untangling them later. It’s weaving them together again in a different way.

Systems Exhaustion and Playing Whack-A-Mole

The more I study systems literature and attempt to apply what I learn, the more I encounter people (including me, multiple times) concentrating on levels of systems that are out of their direct or indirect influence.

Too Much Structure?

It's important to demonstrate that adding too much structure can introduce whole new activities and efforts. And sometimes, that new work defeats the purpose of the original task.

The Design Way

My favorite design book — without question. The Design Way, written by Harold G. Nelson and Erik Stolterman can be summarized as dismantling problems and solutions as the primary intellectual framing of design, and software development in general.